Chapter 3.

IDENTIFYING 'HER' PROPAGATIONS
THROUGH 'HER' 'HARLOTS'.

In the year 1968, my eldest son Christopher was eight years old, David was four, and Peter only five months. It was with very mixed feelings that we travelled from Abbey Wood S.E.2., to Cwmbran, South Wales, to live. My wife Diane made her feelings known from the outset, that she resented the move. She felt despondent and homesick for some years after. Fortunately, Cwmbran had a wide cross-section of people from all over the British Isles, mainly due to population overspills from the cities, so none of us felt isolated or segregated, as is sometimes the case when families move to a strange and distant place that has a different dialect and outlook. But another form of segregation did take place. More about that later.

As a family, we like living in Cwmbran now. It's a new town located close to the countryside. The main shopping precinct has been developed with the local community in mind, and the town as a whole provides a pleasant contrast to the repetitive housing designs one sees in many new towns; where unrestrained town planning and economic considerations have triumphed over human need. But in Cwmbran this has been offset by lovely local landscaping, and was a vast improvement over the dismal new town at Abbey Wood.  Cwmbran is the result of varied designs of housing estate built around a few small villages. But while new industries attract people from all corners of Britain, people here are not a close-knit community. It's a place that needs some definable character of its own. And as for the surrounding countryside, it would certainly benefit local residents if its ownership were shared with the townspeople, instead of being kept under the self-interested control of some insignificant small farmers, depriving everyone else of it.

*               *               *

After a couple of years of life in Cwmbran had passed, a man calling himself a Jehovah's Witness (JW) visited (apparently their local so-called 'elder'), to expound the Scriptures to me. During his second visit he made it imperative for me to tell him: "You are an apostate, aren't you?"

Further visits were terminated. Not long after that, we moved to an adjacent street, and a larger house. It was here that another JW called, a woman this time. She arranged for me to begin my Bible studies again, with her husband. I mentioned to her my experience with her local 'elder,' and she replied,

"Oh! He's not with us any longer."

During my weekly Bible studies, it came to my attention that this 'elder' had left his wife and family, the congregation, and the area, to live with another woman. Sadly, he was replaced with other apostates. Although it was not wittingly my intended purpose, I was learning a great deal about a certain type, who I now know to be the scripturally described composite "man of lawlessness" and "disgusting thing" "standing (in authority) in a holy place." ⁽¹⁰⁾  But some years were yet to pass before it finally dawned upon me that I was the one being used to publicly expose them, in fulfilment of the Scriptures. ⁽¹⁰⁾

It was in 1971 that JWs set up and put into effect worldwide their supposedly innocent and seemingly beneficial new arrangement; the details of which they published in their Yearbook and declared to all their congregations. This new arrangement was to 'shift' responsibilities of Spirit anointed ones away from them (to remove the "constant feature" of anointed ones) ⁽¹¹⁾ by the appointment of their own so-called 'elders'. I was cunningly approached to accept their new arrangement. My refusal to do so aroused in them great anger. I conveyed to them that they did not have the spiritual or scriptural qualifications to appoint themselves to such positions of authority.

A mild form of ostracism began after that, and I was carefully watched. Instinctively, and according to my newly acquired spirit knowledge, I also began making it known that their women members did not have the scriptural authority to teach at all, and especially not men. ⁽¹²⁾  This inflamed them further, as women were teaching men inside the congregation, and teaching heads of families during their house to house preaching (searches).

I knew all their actions to be directly against the written Word of God, which they do not, and cannot, dispute. And yet, they still allow women to teach, and use unsealed men to appoint each other. Then I began asking myself: Why do they allow this? Surely, they must know it is wrong? The answer to these questions, to be explained later, is what my own work became.

As regards the composite "man of lawlessness," events certainly came to a head when I partook at the "Lord's evening meal." This act was a declaration that I am a Spirit anointed son of God, (declared in the year 1975). They immediately appointed even more so-called 'elders,' doubling their number to a total of fourteen; even adding to their number a well known SCHIZOPHRENIC. ⁽¹³⁾  Although only a few miles away, a much larger congregation of JWs in Newport had only one of these offending so-called 'elders,' and no anointed ones among them to 'shift'. Whatever, the analytically described revelations contained in The Opened "Little Scroll" give ample evidence to prove that their 'shifting' ⁽¹⁴⁾ of anointed sons of God was to establish apostate congregations, by twisting the meanings of parts of God's Word to give them the authoritative credibility and means to accomplish that end. Anointed ones act as a restraint against the "man of lawlessness," so a 'shifting' of them was bound to take place, along with their schemes of "trampling" (dispiriting) them. ⁽¹⁵⁾ The following are shameful extracts from the 1975 Yearbook of 'Jehovah's Witnesses' (Pg. 248 & 250):

'THIS IS GOD'S DOING'

'Reflecting on the new congregational arrangement providing for elders and ministerial servants, Roger Morgan was moved to say: "This is God's doing." Doubtless others will agree, since they may have considered the resulting benefits. The first shifting of responsibilities began in September 1972, and by October 1 the arrangement of things in most congregations had been adjusted'.

'CHOOSING ELDERS AND MINISTERIAL SERVANTS'

'The governing body of Jehovah's witnesses sent each congregation an instructive letter about selecting the "body of elders," as well as ministerial servants. According to that letter of December 1, 1971, all baptised men of the congregation twenty years old and upward were considered'.

As confirmation of "the transgression", I received a letter from them containing their allegations against me -- that I had undermined them. Without evidence that I had misused God's Word or mistreated any member of the congregation, these so-called JW 'elders' set up a kangaroo court by which to disfellowship me.

I was excommunicated, and so were my family. We were also, by our proven loyalty to God and his Word, delivered from this final and most cunning part of religious "Babylon": ⁽¹⁶⁾  A new fabricated congregational arrangement of their making, scripturally described as the "disgusting thing standing in a holy place."

Although my eldest son Christopher and I discontinued our attendance at their meetings, we conducted our own as a family at home, and for a while continued preaching the Word from house to house, fulfilling the prophesied three and a half scriptural years. ⁽¹⁷⁾  After being sent into the spirit "wilderness," I received further spirit knowledge, poured into me through spirit visions. Particularly, they were of denunciations to be declared against the twisted teachings that this composite "man of lawlessness" had used to "trample" and remove anointed sons of God, and of their changing of the "times and law" of God ⁽¹⁸⁾ to invade anointed congregations of God on earth.

I carefully wrote down these denunciations from God. Many of them were sent to their individual members, and to their congregations. The scriptural "Little Scroll" I realised, had begun to be written up, and was being "prophesied again." ⁽¹⁹⁾  Beginning with the teaching of 2 Corinthians 3:1: "Are We Starting Again to Recommend Ourselves?" (14/12/76), the manuscript of The Opened "Little Scroll" of Revelation chapter 10 is the legal case of God concerning and against "the transgression" against God.

Further discernments have come to light through spirit visions and disciplines. Diane, Christopher, and David, have been baptised through the "good news" of the Christ.

The all-important facts concerning all this, is that there has always been an anointed "congregation" of The Christ Jesus existing on earth, ever since the literal fleshly presence of The Christ (The first anointed one). This "congregation" is referred to as the remaining ones, those who receive the "hidden manna" ⁽²⁰⁾ of spiritual food for Christ's other faithful sheep-like ones. Gathered throughout many generations, this "congregation" is finally in total 144,000 sanctified brothers of The Christ. They are to become a heavenly "kingdom" of underpriests to rule over mankind, ⁽²¹⁾ but who were scattered into a "wilderness" condition while on earth.

The fulfilled apostasy of "certain men" ⁽²²⁾ "casting lots," ⁽²³⁾ and of them apportioning out (by usurping authority within Christ's spirit congregations) authority within His "land", was prophesied to take place immediately before the conclusion of this world's system of things (of the "Esau" age), and the imminent arrival of the rule of God. ⁽²⁴⁾  Our Lord adopted this 'thief-like' way to separate "Babylonian"-type lawless "goats" from his "sheep"-like congregation and their faithful descendants gathered by His Spirit.

Sects are unGodly deviations of "Babylonian" descent. They are such by personal choice. By this I mean, they are instituted arrangements to suit rebellious spirits and their handed-down cowardly excuses for wanting to depart from the central doctrines already established through The Christ.

As to the presumption of unsealed men in Christ's congregations, falsely calling themselves witnesses of God without His appointing of them, their destiny is assured. ⁽²⁵⁾

All sectarian people have one thing in common: Despite having conflicting beliefs as to what constitutes Christian living and its rules of conduct, they all reach the same crossroads of the defined requirements of faith. It is then, that their own spirit and conscience deviates along another path, away from absolute obedience to the Holy Spirit and its associated disciplines, which draw out their true desires and tests them as to fitness, according to the same spirit of accurate knowledge in God's Word.

At one's personal crossroads, there are the subtle signs of divination; which keep those that love to walk along these paths of self-excuse, in ignorance, especially if it includes a measure of self-glory for them.

From their knowledge of the faith, and of the present system of this "darkness", the faithful know that the path to life will bring from specious christians and others troublesome ostracisms (ACHOR), ⁽²⁶⁾ persecutions, and other forms of hatred.

*               *               * 

The purpose of the next part of this book is to identify the 'signposts' that direct one along the way to a life that God accepts, and not to seek the acceptance of mere men.

When I was a child, I attended a Protestant church. Many years later, I became acquainted with another religious group, the apostate ideology of the Mormons. Soon after, I learned about the so-called Christian works of the sect calling themselves Jehovah's Witnesses.

I deem all this to be my own progressive coming out of the religious part of mystic "Babylon." This symbolic name represents both spiritistic and commercially materialistic error (the two parts). Commercial "Babylon" and politics are together used as a vehicle for sectarian "harlotry" ⁽²⁷⁾ and other abominations.

Babel, which later became known as Babylon (meaning: confusion) was the capitol of the first political empire, founded by Nimrod. The remains of fifty-three temples to false gods have been discovered there, and were where magic, astrology, dungy idols (humans) and other gods and goddesses were worshipped, and where the tower of Babel was built over 2,000 years BC. All this idolatry has been handed down to rebellious people today.

It was to religious misleaders that Jesus charged the responsibility for "all the righteous blood spilled on earth" (Matthew 23:29-35); those "drunk with the blood of the holy ones, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus." (Rev 17:6).⁽²⁸⁾

The "mother" and her "harlot" daughters (false religions) are the spiritual counterpart of the literal ancient city of Babylon. The final manifestations of mystic "Babylon" is her end as a "dwelling place of demons," clearly evident among those committing "fornication" with her through her "dungy idols" (humans idols being idolised) such as church misleaders, politicians, idols of music, stage, screen, etc.

God likens human idols to excrement. They stimulate their emotions and those of other humans to such adverse levels in their hearts and minds, that they even shut out true spiritual thought and related activities as respects their Creator's Will and purpose meant for them. This is particularly so, with those idols that entertain. We have been warned in advance, that those who succumb to the worship of human dungy idols, and exchange the truth of God for the lie administered by these idols, have been put under a delusion by God "which works upon them to believe the lie". (2 Thess 2:10-12 NEB).

Some religious misleaders wear "outlandish fashions" (the uniform of their particular sect) to lift themselves above others visually. These are dungy idols ⁽²⁹⁾ (Zephaniah 1:8 NEB). But there are many others who go to people's houses in ordinary garb; even after the "good news" of gathering through The Christ has "finished." ⁽³⁰⁾ They are all under the "delusion" from God.

*               *               *

Through her constant persecution, my greatest enemy unwittingly proved instrumental to the spirit development of my family and myself, by our endurance: A neighbour living nearby, with characteristics identical to the false prophetess Jezebel, with cunning nature, pouting expressions, cowardly husband, and spoiled 'fruitage'. ⁽³¹⁾  So we bless these who have unintentionally helped us, through their persecutions of us. I thanked them personally for this.

I am still visited with spirit warnings in my dreams, some with fulfilments following soon afterwards. While my family have all the basic necessities, we are particularly mindful of the coming wrath of God, and maintain our hope in His Kingdom rule over the coming new "heavens" and new "earth." Lately, we have noticed a significant reduction in the level of persecution from wicked ones. My sons Christopher and David have remained faithful and have an accurate knowledge of the Will of God. They have proved to be a great joy and comfort to me, and to each other.

While I have written many denunciations against mystic "Babylon" and the political image of the "wild beast", it is necessary to realise that these strong influences of "Babylon" could not have been prevented, as more than 1,900 years ago they were prophesied to take place. ⁽³²⁾  The important consideration for God's people now, is that we obey the command: "Away from Babylon; come out, come out, touch nothing unclean. Come out from Babylon, keep yourselves pure, you who carry the vessels of the Lord." ⁽³³⁾

Contrary to the majority of so-called Christian beliefs, one cannot serve God through His Son while also living in "Babylon," whether wittingly or unwittingly. Those who are found still in "Babylon" will not be delivered. Only those who have come out of "Babylon" are delivered, awaiting the coming realities. The political image of the "wild beast" is the direct opposite and enemy of The Christ's holy priesthood about to rule over mankind.

But to criticize destructive "Babylon," is not stating the one important and life‑giving alternative. So let me state that alternative: It is one's obedience to the Spirit priesthood of God, by the Spirit helper Holy Spirit from The Christ Michael, and administered through his Spirit anointed 144,000 brothers, the priesthood. ⁽³⁴⁾  Throughout the generations, anointed ones on earth have been the channels of and for spirit provision; of necessary spirit instruction for obedient people that are being sanctified, while on earth. Because of people's rebellion against the Spirit of God, we have for the most part been ignored and "trampled" on till now, and latterly have lived in a death-like state of inactivity on earth. ⁽³⁵⁾ Successive generations since The Christ have had some of these anointed members, of the total number, to go to. But with each generation, the number remaining on earth has reduced, through their deaths. To ignore them, is to ignore communications from God. The erroneous concept that one may be a Christian by believing only in the words Christ uttered when he was on earth, and ignore the instructions he gave by Holy Spirit through his disciples after his death and resurrection to spirit life, has kept many away from God. In other words, after his fleshly demise The Christ has continued the Will of God through his disciples.

*               *               *

With care, a ball of string is easy to use, and is useful for many purposes. If though, through misuse, it is repeatedly left in a knotted and tangled mess, it causes those who try to use it thereafter much frustration. We may use this analogy to describe the conditions prevailing among earth's peoples and their tangled mess of knotted systems. To attempt to free them too quickly of all of their knotted and institutionalized indoctrinations would cause them even greater distress than already exists. Therefore, it is wiser for people to gradually be made aware, by clear identification of these unGodly systems, and by active self-analysis. By this I mean, according to an open-minded and rational self-appraisal, followed by corrective readjustments of oneself, toward a lasting peace and happiness, progressively freeing oneself from bondage to such error.

Among the greatest of these injurious systems is that of institutionalized education. Child dupery, forcefully instituted by State legislation, is the satanic method adopted to prevent God's law of the spirit being administered. While the educational establishment is unable to offer a single legal statute to support the concept of a recognized standard of education, it still challenges the idea of children being educated by their own parents at home by suggesting that such children would be ostracized by the other children, and that nowadays financial necessity requires both parents to be in full-time employment; thereby denying them the time and resources to love and educate their own children. The educational establishment has other means, such as depriving public libraries of the quality and quantity of educational books for home education.

Through the institution of such satanic cunning, an accepted 'norm' is established that removes the God-given prerogative of parents to teach their own children. Parents who reject their obligations are wilfully rejecting God. As evidence of people's veiled thinking and disobedience in this matter, I have included a transcription of a tape recorded conversation between me and two Local Education Authority advisors. Mr. F was an ex-school teacher, and Mr. P a so-called professor.

These two men called on me (an arrangement of their own making) while a court hearing instituted by the L. E. A. was pending in respect of my son Peter and his education. I had begun to educate him at home; away from the demonic influences of the local establishment they call school. Although the threatened court action failed to materialise, in anticipation of it I prepared questions to be put to Mr. F and Mr. P at the hearing, as follows:

Self:  "Mr. F, during your visit at my home, did you inform me that you are a trained teacher? Have you taught many children? Would you briefly describe your  past and present occupation?"

Mr. F: (Admission to previously being a trained teacher).

Self: "So during your career as a teacher, you felt you had the right to teach other people's children, but do not believe that parents --including yourself-- have the right to teach their own children. Is this not true, as you stated during your visit to my home? May I remind you that your remarks were recorded supporting this view."

Mr. F: "..."

Self: "Do you still think parents do not have no right to teach their own children, to make such decisions, as you conveyed to me when you came to see me about my son Peter and his education?"

Mr. F: "…"

Self:    "Were you qualified to educate your own children at home?"

Mr. F: (His admission)

Self: So to summarise, you believe in teaching other people's children, but not your own? You leave your own children to be taught by others, by strangers in many cases? Why, Mr. F?"

Mr. F: "..."

On reviewing a transcript of the remarks made by the two L. E. A. officials, I discovered they had made the following admissions:

(1) "I am a caring father."

(2) "Peter is an intelligent boy."

(3) "I have a keenness for learning."

(4) They were in agreement that, "I do not use academics as a substitute of excuse for experience, or for doing work with my hands."

(5) That going far or a long way academically, "is to do one's best only in one's academic and mental ability."

(Neither the true meaning, nor their intended use of the word 'academic' was offered, probably because it can only be used in a substitute way; in the same way that the word 'school' is used as a metonymy, but which really means 'leisure.' In consequence of their admissions, I pose two questions:

How can total strangers benefit a child as to the child's personal needs and ability, more than his or her own parent(s)? And what is the true source of the imposed authority that so-called educators have over other people's children, and intended by their use of the word 'academic'? Good order within communities can only be achieved through their practice of good moral principles. By contrast, the 'fruitage' of humanity warring against Godly principles comes from State schools.

My own experiences within society, with its enforced conformity, as compared with the non-productive lives of school teachers and other self-excusing desk minders such as L. E. A. officials and their subordinates, prepared me for the work of exposing and bring their deception to light. But it did not prepare me for the ostracism of my son outside school hours by Peter's State-institutionalized former friends: Evidence of the underlying hateful demonic fruitage of so-called taught ones at State schools.

Of course, one-to-one learning far outweighs the economic advantages of large classes. State-run schools have only become necessary because of indolent parents, military recruitment, and enforcement agencies of "goat"-like political misleaders "driving others to work" at whatever they deem expedient. (Isaiah 14:4). Mr. F was right when he said (and I quote from the tape recording):

"...the two have got to go together" (the work of production and invention). (That was not, however, his own way of doing things, as a full-time academic advisor (meddler) between parents and their children. He neglected the daily interaction of teaching his own offspring, and left that obligation to others he never even vetted.

The expression education 'or otherwise' as contained in the Education Act should really only be applied to State-controlled education created by unGodly politicians and rebellious parents, as it is they who reject their Maker's Will for them by using State education instead of educating their children themselves.

The origin and true meaning of the word school is as follows:

From the Greek sko.le', basically "leisure"; then, that for which leisure was employed, a disputation, lecture, study, learning; by metonymy, (substitute) school. So school was not intended as an enforced arrangement, penalizing parents for not sending their children to a State institution.

The Creator placed upon parents the responsibility of teaching their own offspring the true meaning of life, of their physical lives as well as their spiritual lives. They were to train them up in the way they were to go, and this training would be a guide to their children, not only in their youth, but also in their old age. ⁽³⁶⁾

Parents were obligated to begin the training during the child's infancy. (2 Timothy 3:14,15). To fulfil this obligation they were to provide education for their children both inside and outside the home. It appears that there were no community schools for children in ancient Israel. The home was the school. The parent was to teach by example as well as by precept, and their training was to be a regular and continuous arrangement. ⁽³⁷⁾

In Britain today, only a relatively small number of children are being educated at home under the provisions of education 'or otherwise' in the Education Act of 1944.

Ostracism by schoolchildren takes place almost immediately against children whose parents have taken them out of a State school to educate them at home.

Such indoctrination is of course deliberate enforcement of the will of one upon the will and freedom of another. The dispiriting campaign waged against home educators is initiated through the State's incorrect application of the word 'academic'. By implication, it segregates those who have proved themselves by their productive work from those so-called academics who only write about it. I refer primarily to those scholastic educators of the State, who introduce many 'veils' to bully lazy and negligent parents, and use the intricacies of the law against them to maintain their positions of self-importance within their school arrangement. They have conclusively proved their own inability to teach children good moral standards. Their resulting 'fruitage' is the many bullies among schoolchildren who cause many of their child victims to commit suicide. Drug-taking is rampant, as is teenage vandalism, and many schoolchildren are becoming pregnant.

Local Education Authorities have been unable to put forward any educational standards that could be tested in law, not even to suit the State's academically trained judiciary; for the judiciary themselves have stated there are none. The judgement of Lord Alveston C. J. set a precedent in the case of Bevan v. Shears 2 King's Bench Division 1911 as follows:

'We have not been referred to any minutes of the Board of Education prescribing that children of a certain minimum age are to receive any particular standard of education. Counsel for the appellant have not been able to refer us to any such document or to any standard of efficiency provided by the Board of Education, nor have we been referred to any authority containing any definition of "efficiency." In these circumstances we decide that it is an answer to a summons for the non-attendance of the child at the authority's school that the child was being properly educated, and that the justices were entitled to find that the education this child was receiving was efficient. The decision of the justices was not wrong because they refused to set up a hypothetical standard of education.' (Nor have they done so to this day, almost 100 years later. And yet, they are still allowed to carry on failing children in their care).

All too frequently, their own proven function and intent has been the imposition of their own will and ideology against the written Word and Will of God and the God‑given obligations of parents, to whom He gave His regulations and laws for the advancement of loving responsible families, for happiness, and good order. This, they have rejected.

One may ask, what are the alternatives for our children's education other than what the State provides? The answer is, of course, what we ourselves as parents provide. The truth is, that State educators are the alternative, the 'or otherwise.'

The following is a quotation the book, 'I'm a Stranger Here Myself' by John Seymour, (page 73-74): 'To a child such as I was, and such as the O'Connor children were, it is hell on earth -- one long ordeal by boredom, and all the time that such children spend hunched over dreary books is time wasted -- time that should be the most vital and important of a child's development, when he or she should be learning the real business of life; the business of producing food, caring for the land, producing good artifacts, enriching life for all people on earth, and, in fact, all life itself.'

He goes on to say: 'The present school system is a huge, self-perpetuating, self‑enlarging creation of the National Union of Teachers. It is being run by the N.U.T. for the N.U.T. and not for the children, or the world of the future, at all. We must 'de‑school' society (as Professor Illich urges us to) very urgently otherwise we shall have a whole nation of clerks and scientists and people on the dole and we shall starve to death.'

'To force children like the O'Connor children to stay at what is to them a prison of a school until they are sixteen, when they have learnt everything they wish to from school by the age of ten, is monstrous.'

As to book learning and what really is important, I think the following verse and comments sum it up nicely.

From every imperfect soul could come

Some goodness of spirit;

If only men observe its ingredients and distil it;

Disposing of the evil dregs.

Now, what will we use? Good sentences like ox goads?

-- Painfully, or wisely?

RT.

Many read books, and some enjoy wise sentences. But while some simply read about the essential things of life that bring benefit, others put what they learn into practice, through their self-readjustment. The avid reader of many books wearies himself out, dismissing any thought of self-readjustment, and usually misses the very purpose of learning: for the creation of one's spirit self, not for one's capacity to memorise facts.

After reasoning on the foregoing, some may wonder what life on earth would be like without the educational institutions; whether we would still be groping in the dark ages of ignorance, without enough food or shelter, or security of any kind, perhaps even anarchy. Others say we already have anarchy, brought about by selfish deprivation and the oppression of political tyrants, and the constant threat of genocide; and all through institutionalised education without God. Comparatively few agree that plenty for all, along with lasting peace and happiness, can only exist among mankind when Godly principles are being correctly administered within families and communities.

Well, needless to say, L. E. A. advisors Mr. F and Mr. P were not heard from again, nor anything more of their imaginary concern for my son Peter. Nor did their threat of court action bear fruit. Strange, wouldn't you agree?

*               *               *